Not T or E: The Lord of The Rings As A Property Law Exam

This is great.

Consider the following facts which seem ripped from a first year property law exam:

  1. Sauron holds ownership in the Ring through accession, by working one thing (base metals) into a new thing (a ring of power)
  2. He is dispossessed by Isildur, who now holds possession in the Ring.
  3. Isildur loses the Ring (he has a manifest intent to exclude others but no physical control) when it slips off his finger as he was swimming in the Anduin river to escape from Orcs.
  4. Degol finds the Ring.
  5. He is dispossessed by Smeagol (a.k.a. Gollum).
  6. Gollum loses the Ring and it is finally found by Bilbo.
  7. Bilbo gifts the Ring to Frodo. Later, Aragorn (the heir of Isildur) tells Frodo to carry the ring to Mordor, making Frodo his bailee.
  8. Sam, assuming that Frodo is dead, takes the Ring according to instructions to help Frodo with the Ring in grave circumstances. Sam is acting here as a (fictional) bailee and he returns possession to Frodo after finding him still alive.
  9. At the end of the book, Gollum restores his possession of the ring. Seconds later, he and the Ring are both destroyed. At this point all property held in the Ring disappears.

Mr. Kaufman and Mr. Ha-Redeye continue to analyze the various parties competing claims to the Ring in this post. Its worth reading if you’re a particularly hard-core geek (of either law or middle-earth) or if you enjoy seeing things from a different perspective… Thanks guys! This was great to read.

0 Responses to “Not T or E: The Lord of The Rings As A Property Law Exam”

  • No Comments

Leave a Reply